Addressing health corruption during a public health crisis through anticipatory governance: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Corruption in the health sector costs over 500 billion USD annually, weakening health system preparedness and response to health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. The lack of resources to deal with a shock limits the capacity to protect the population, exposing them to a greater risk of infection and mortality. There is an urgent need to improve health policy to reduce corruption in the health sector during times of crisis. This article aims to propose a prepare and response strategy to address corruption during times of health crises. We first explore the inherent characteristics of health systems that make them vulnerable to corruption and present the different faces corrupt practices take. We then explain why anticipatory governance is fundamental in addressing corruption in health systems and draw upon examples of corruption during COVID-19. Finally, we conclude by proposing that anticipatory governance could decrease the impact of corruption during health crises by increasing the availability of resources required to improve the population's health.

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES IN EMERGENCY PUBLIC PROCUREMENT CAUSED BY THE COVID-19 HEALTH CRISIS. A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN SPAIN AND MEXICO

Emergency public procurement during the COVID-19 health crisis has been a resourceful instrument to provide an immediate response to public needs by the public administrations. The States have developed different emergency legislation and measures to resolve a crisis, as both the Spanish and Mexican cases demonstrate. The implementation of an emergency public contract shows some risks such as weakness in the legal bases and emergency reasoning, a disproportionate use or a deficiency in the administrative control that can affect the legal principles related to procurement. This article demonstrates the existence of different meanings of the concept, nature, and requirements of emergency public procurement. Based on anticipatory governance, Public Administrations must be prepared to use strategic public procurement to contribute to strengthening the Rule of Law within times a context of crisis.

COVID-19 contact tracing apps: UK public perceptions.

In order to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, policymakers around the globe have increasingly invested in digital health technologies to support the 'test, track and trace' approach of containing the spread of the novel coronavirus. These technologies include mobile 'contact tracing' applications (apps), which can trace individuals likely to have come into contact with those who have reported symptoms or tested positive for the virus and request that they self-isolate. This paper takes a critical public health perspective that advocates for 'genuine participation' in public health interventions and emphasises the need to take citizen's knowledge into account during public health decision-making. In doing so, it presents and discusses the findings of a UK interview study that explored public views on the possibility of using a COVID-19 contact-tracing app public health intervention at the time the United Kingdom (UK) Government announced their decision to develop such a technology. Findings illustrated interviewees' range and degree of understandings, misconceptions, and concerns about the possibility of using an app. In particular, concerns about privacy and surveillance predominated. Interviewees associated these concerns much more broadly than health by identifying with pre-existent British national narratives associated with individual liberty and autonomy. In extending and contributing to ongoing sociological research with public health, we argue that understanding and responding to these matters is vital, and that our findings demonstrate the need for a forward-looking, anticipatory strategy for public engagement as part of the responsible innovation of the COVID-19 contact-tracing app in the UK.